Resilience

How to weather and recover from adversity, get unstuck and thrive?

Andy Weeger

Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences

September 3, 2024

Motivation

How we deal with our inner worlds does drive everything. Susan David, Psychologist

In our modern societies, we attribute a lot to externalities. Often we think that we can change anything by changing externalities (e.g., changing our look to become more self-confident). And the external world does matter. Just think of what we discussed during the last lectures (e.g., “shaping the path”). But ultimately, the way we navigate our inner world, our ability to be healthy with ourselves, with our emotions, to be connected with our values and who we want to be, this has an outsize impact on everything else.

This class is about emotional agility, the ability to come to your inner world—your thoughts, emotions, experiences and self-stories—with courage, compassion and curiosity. We try to find answers to the questions why and how we should learn from them, evaluate the situations we face, be clear-sighted about your options and move forward with values and purpose.

Foundation

This unit is inspired by and based on the books Resilience by Southwick, Charney, and DePierro (2023) and Emotional Agility by S. David (2016)

This book written by world leaders on the science of resilience, is a must-read for everyone … The lessons in this book are what we should teach our children. Barbara Olasov Rothbaum

Susan David is the leading authority on how our thoughts, emotions, and motives can empower or derail us. Her work combines compelling research, an engaging style, and practical wisdom to show people how to create meaningful change in their lives in order to thrive. Peter Salovey, President, Yale University

**Resilience** by Southwick, Charney, and DePierro (2023) and **Emotional Agility** by S. David (2016)

Reflection

Think of some hardship you have experienced and mastered.
What helped you to do so?

Think for yourself first (5 minutes) and then discuss with your neighbor the things that were helpful (10 minutes). You can stay with the measures, and do not have to share the distress if you don’t want to.

Resilience

Opening quote

We assumed resilience was rare, reserved for a select group of unique individuals. We were wrong. Resilience is common. It can be witnessed all around us, and for most people it can be enhanced through learning and training Southwick, Charney, and DePierro (2023, 22)

Definition

The term resilience is used to describe an individual’s capacity to withstand and ultimately recover from adversity.
(Southwick, Charney, and DePierro 2023)

Themes of resilience

In their research, Southwick, Charney, and DePierro (2023) identified recurring themes that characterize resilient people:

Confrontation with fears
Maintaining of an optimistic but realistic outlook
Searching, accepting, and providing social support
Imitating resilient role models
Relying on a inner moral compass
Turning to religious or spiritual practices
Attending to health and well-being
Remaining curious, pushing to learn new things
Approaching problems with flexibility, and, at times, acceptance
Finding meaning and growth during and after traumatic experiences

Resources

Building resilience and bouncing back is easier for some than it is for others.
(Southwick, Charney, and DePierro 2023)

The privileges that my be conferred by race and several other identities in our society need to be acknowledged. In addition, people with valuable resources such as financial security, good health, and rich social networks can leverage these resources when adversities happen.

Optimism

Optimism is a future-oriented attitude that includes confidence that things will turn out well.
(Southwick, Charney, and DePierro 2023)

Our emotions are strongly tied to our attention and behavior (e.g., surviving or learning). Unlike pessimists, optimist do not remain focused on the negative. When optimist broaden their attention, they increase their capacity to reappraise situations that initially seemed negative. This allows them to (sometimes) see challenge in hardship and opportunities to grow.

Emotional agility

Reflection

We all perceive different kinds of emotions in our everyday life.

Which emotions are good,
which are bad?

Bad or good emotions?

According to S. David (2016), there is a core narrative about emotions¹:
There are good emotions (e.g., joy, happiness) and bad emotions (e.g., grief, anger)

However, beauty and fragility often go hand in hand².

Research shows that struggling to determine whether a thought or feeling is good or bad can …

take up huge amounts of mental energy,
lead the thought or emotion to hang around for longer,
decrease our ability to solve problems,
negatively impact our relationships, and,
lead to lower levels of well-being over time (S. David 2016).

Bothness

Bothness is the idea that you can do something even if you are scared to do it. We can be afraid and still engage with a challenge. We can grieve and still laugh at a joke.

Bothness gives us access to the full spectrum of life. Too often, we think that life is a series of either/or decisions. Be bold. Choose both.

We can label thoughts and emotions as good and bad, treat them as facts (e.g., “I am sad”), or allow them to become our identity.

We can also treat them differently and create space for other aspects of ourselves to come forward. We can embrace bothness, reflecting the complex, contradictory, real.

Bothness is the idea that you can do something even if you are scared to do it. It’s the idea that you can feel angry with your partner, notice that anger with compassion, and still reach out and give them a hug, because you recognize how much you value the relationship. There is wisdom in bothness. We can be afraid and still engage with a challenge. We can grieve and still laugh at a joke. Bothness gives us access to the full spectrum of life. Too often, we think that the world is a series of either/or decisions. Be bold. Choose both. Susan David, Psychologist

Let’s listen to the expert

Thoughts on emotion and behavior

René Magritte’s artwork “The Treachery of Images” (1929), often referred to as “The Pipe,” is one of his most famous pieces. The painting features a realistic image of a tobacco pipe with the caption “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” (French for “This is not a pipe”) written below it.

This work is a classic example of Surrealism, challenging viewers’ perceptions of reality and representation. Magritte’s point was that the painting is not a pipe, but merely an image of one. This creates a paradox, emphasizing the difference between an object and its representation.

The painting is housed at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and continues to be a significant piece in discussions about art, language, and meaning.

The image is not the thing, the map is not the territory.

Categories, snap impressions, gut feelings are good as they prevent “decision paralysis”.
However, when they dominate the way we process information and behave, we lack agility and do not pay attention to the world as it is.

Growth and freedom

Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and freedom. Frankl (1985)

Emotional rigidity vs. agility

Emotional rigidity vs. emotional agility (S. David 2016)

Figure 1: Emotional rigidity vs. emotional agility

People frequently die in fires or crash landings because they try to escape through the same door they used when they entered. S. David (2016)

If you’re ‘emotionally rigid’, you’re blind to new experiences and possibilities. You’ll find yourself stuck on the same path, even though it has made you unhappy for years. Picture a Naval officer demanding a lighthouse change course without realizing it wasn’t a ship (S. David 2016, 1). The belief was that his vessel had right of way but such rigid thinking could have led to catastrophe! Adopting agility in your emotions is more likely to steer you on the right path and allow you to be flexible when you need to be.

Emotional agility is needed as the world is constantly changing and, thus, always presenting us with new opportunities and situations to which conditions or pre-programmed cognitive and emotional responses are not helpful. We should, thus, always embrace a beginners mind.

Hooked

Getting hooked means that we let our actions be guided by our thoughts, feelings, and stories, rather than of what is really important to us.

A ‘hook’ is a thought or emotion that draws us in and keeps us preoccupied. These hooks are often extremely counter-productive.

The four most common hooks:

Thought blaming: “I thought I’d embarrass myself, so I didn’t go.”
Monkey mindedness: Dwelling at length on a situation and ‘awfulising’ the circumstances.
Old, outgrown ideas: Believing that you must always act in ways that you have in the past, even when the circumstances might prove otherwise.
Wrongheaded righteousness: The need to be ‘right’ at all costs.

Key signs that you’re hooked are when you

try to avoid having particular thoughts or rationalize them away (e.g. “I’m unhappy in my job… but at least I’ve got a job!”);
always try to ‘think positive’ or be happy;
ignore troubling emotions (like sadness);
blame your thoughts for having ‘made you’ do something e.g. ‘I yelled at him because It thought he was undermining me,’ or ‘I1 didn’t put my hand up for the project because I thought I might fail.’;
over analyze specific experiences (e.g. a past disappointment); or
fight against the reality of the world and your life ‘as it is’.

Signs you’re hooked at work

You can’t let of an idea or of “being right” even when there is an obviously better course of action.
You stay silent when you know something is going wrong.
You busy yourself with small tasks without considering the big picture.
You become apathetic.
You volunteer for only the least difficult assignments or tasks.
You make backhanded comments about coworkers or projects.
You rely on assumptions or stereotypes about your colleagues.
You aren’t taking agency over your own career development.

Getting unhooked

David’s (2016) framework for increasing emotional agility

Figure 2: David’s (2016) framework for increasing emotional agility

Show up

The first step is acknowledging emotions and stresses as they occur – not to dwell on them, but to learn. What am I feeling right now? What does this say about my values? An emotionally agile person is able to recognize their feelings with self-compassion and understanding.

Being more self-compassionate includes:

letting go of self-criticism and expectations of perfection (within yourself, your work, your life at home);
recognizing that comparing yourself with others is, almost always, a losing game;
understanding that self-compassion does not make you weak or lazy. In fact, research shows the opposite - that self-compassion sharpens your edge;
appreciating that self-compassion is not about lying to yourself. People who are self-compassionate are more likely to face into the truth about themselves and their weaknesses, than those who lack self-compassion.

Stepping out

Stepping out means facing and labeling the problem. You need to take an objective view and assess your emotions. This can help you filter feelings that may not be entirely appropriate and to find ways to deal with what you are feeling.

When you step out objectively, you are in control of your feelings and not the other way around.

Skills you can cultivate:

The ability for you, the thinker, rather than the thought to be in charge, and for you, the person, rather than your emotions to be in charge. In other words, developing the skill that allows you to be centered, reflective and intentional in your reactions to events around you.
Developing a ‘meta view’ or the ability to still feel your feelings and think your thoughts but to ‘helicopter’ above these in order to make effective decisions.
The ability to recognize when you are holding on to specific positions and ideas in ways that may not serve your life, and to let go of these.

Walking your why

‘Walking your why’ means discovering what is important to you and acting accordingly. When you walk your why, you live by your personal values as closely as you possibly can. Living by your values will help to make your life more meaningful and satisfying.

While it is not always possible to work or live the exact life you wish, there is usually a way to make your life or job fit better within your values.

Some characteristics of values (S. David 2016)

Values

are freely chosen; have not been imposed on you;
are not goals; they are ongoing rather than fixed;
guide you rather then constrain you;
are active not static;
allow you to get closer to the way you want to life your life;
bring you freedom from social comparison;
foster self-acceptance, which is crucial for mental health.

When we move towards our values and are able to make choices that align us with who we want to be, that is incredibly empowering, and provides a new found sense of autonomy in difficult situations.

To make a difference in this area it may help you to:

Watch the gaps: Simply noticing the gaps between your values and your behaviors in specific domains (at work, home, in your relationships or as they relate to your health and wellbeing) can help you to close them.
Think first: “is my response in line with my values of Accountability, Straightforwardness and Challenge?”
Remember that values are not abstract and intangible ideas. Rather they are qualities of action that you can bring to every day choices.

Move on

Once you’ve unpacked what you’re feeling, why you’re feeling that way, and aligned your next steps with who you want to be in the situation, it’s time to move on and take action.

Emotionally agile individuals handle situations as they come up, feel them fully, make a plan, and don’t delay.

This requires some critical areas of focus:

A change mindset: developing the belief that positive change is actually possible. Research shows that subtle differences in our beliefs about change can have a long-term impact across many different areas of our lives.
Effective motivations: trying to make a change based on a ‘have-to’ motivation (e.g. to lose weight out of a sense of obligation to your doctor, spouse, or due to shame) is less likely to be effective than a change based on a ‘want-to’ motivation (e.g. to lose weight out of a genuine, internal desire to be healthier.) The type of motivation we have is critically important in determining whether a change will be successful.
Habit tweaks: understanding how to master the physics of successful habit change.
Moving to discomfort: making the choice to push oneself towards the edge of one’s comfort zone as one tries to develop skills and cultivate relationships.

Closing remark

Who’s in charge—the thinker or the thought?’ Are we managing our own lives according to our own values and what is important to us, or are we simply being carried along by the tide? S. David (2016)

Challenges

You want to learn how to lead change more efficiently? Here are three challenges that might help you along the way.

Level 1: Reflect through writing. During next next two weeks, take 10 minutes at the end of each day to write about your emotional experiences from the past day; don’t worry about making it perfect or readable: go where your mind takes you; it’s not about the document (you can delete it); the point is that those thoughts are now out of you and on the page.
Level 2: Watch the gaps. Identify the values (i.e., qualities of action), that are important to you³; analyze your behaviors in challenging situations and watch the gaps between them and your values (i.e., is my response in line with my values of …)—often simply noticing gaps can help to close them
Level 3: Getting unhooked. extend watch the gaps and recognize your patterns, notice if you’ve been hooked by your thoughts and feelings; if so, label them, accept them, and then act on your values (i.e., take deliberate action that aligns with your values; do not revert to the familiar, but take and enjoy the challenge, without being overwhelmed)

Reading list

For digging deeper, I recommend reading the articles of the reading exercise (again) plus following articles/books:

Psychological flexibility: Bond, Hayes, and Barnes-Holmes (2013), Kashdan (2010)
Self awareness: Brown and Ryan (2003)
Logotherapy: Frankl (1985)
Emotional agility: Susan David and Congleton (2013) (HBR), S. David (2016) (book)
Differences in emotion regulation processes: Gross and John (2003)
Reflect through writing: Lepore and Greenberg (2002), Slatcher and Pennebaker (2006)
ACT: Luoma, Hayes, and Walser (2007), Wilson (2014)
Fundamental attribution error: Tetlock (1985)
Acceptance and commitment therapy: Hayes et al. (2006)

Q&A

Literature

Bond, Frank W, Steven C Hayes, and Dermot Barnes-Holmes. 2013. “Psychological Flexibility, ACT, and Organizational Behavior.” In Acceptance and Mindfulness at Work: Applying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Relational Frame Theory to Organizational Behavior Management, 25–54. Routledge.

Brown, Kirk Warren, and Richard M Ryan. 2003. “The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (4): 822.

David, S. 2016. Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change, and Thrive in Work and Life. Penguin Publishing Group.

David, Susan, and Christina Congleton. 2013. “Emotional Agility.” Harvard Business Review 91 (11): 125–31.

Frankl, V. E. 1985. Man’s Search for Meaning. A Touchstone Book. Pocket Books.

Gross, James J, and Oliver P John. 2003. “Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2): 348.

Hayes, Steven C, Jason B Luoma, Frank W Bond, Akihiko Masuda, and Jason Lillis. 2006. “Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, Processes and Outcomes.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 44 (1): 1–25.

Kashdan, Todd B. 2010. “Psychological Flexibility as a Fundamental Aspect of Health.” Clinical Psychology Review 30 (7): 865–78.

Lepore, Stephen J, and Melanie A Greenberg. 2002. “Mending Broken Hearts: Effects of Expressive Writing on Mood, Cognitive Processing, Social Adjustment and Health Following a Relationship Breakup.” Psychology and Health 17 (5): 547–60.

Luoma, Jason B, Steven C Hayes, and Robyn D Walser. 2007. Learning ACT: An Acceptance & Commitment Therapy Skills-Training Manual for Therapists. New Harbinger Publications.

Slatcher, Richard B, and James W Pennebaker. 2006. “How Do i Love Thee? Let Me Count the Words: The Social Effects of Expressive Writing.” Psychological Science 17 (8): 660–64.

Southwick, S. M., D. S. Charney, and J. M. DePierro. 2023. Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life’s Greatest Challenges. Cambridge University Press.

Tetlock, Philip E. 1985. “Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 227–36.

Wilson, Kelly G. 2014. The ACT Matrix: A New Approach to Building Psychological Flexibility Across Settings and Populations. New Harbinger Publications.

Footnotes

The labels god and bad are, e.g., also used in most of the academic articles about emotions.
When you love someone, your also open up yourself to having your heart broken—life demands that you can experience some of the so-called bad thoughts and bad emotions — that is “the truth of living”.
Possible personal values as noted in Susan David and Congleton (2013): accuracy, achievement, adventure, authority, autonomy, caring, challenge, change, comfort, compassion, contribution, cooperation, courtesy, creativity, dependability, duty, family, forgiveness, friendship, fun, generosity, genuineness, growth, health, helpfulness, honesty, humility, humor, justice, knowledge, leisure, mastery, moderation, nonconformity, openness, order, passion, popularity, power, purpose, rationality, realism, responsibility, risk, safety, self-knowledge, service, simplicity, stability, tolerance, tradition, wealth