Administrivia 🧐

Strategy and Performance Management

Andy Weeger

Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences

July 22, 2025

Motivation

There is more vacuity about strategy than about any other topic in business today. John Kay, Financial Times in Mintzberg et al. (2005)

While this observation about strategic vacuity remains painfully relevant, it reflects a deeper challenge: in contemporary firms, strategy can no longer be untangled from digital technologies, particularly AI. Modern strategizing processes—from competitive analysis and resource allocation to performance monitoring and strategic adaptation—are increasingly embedded within and enabled by digital systems.

Understanding business strategy frameworks, strategic planning processes, and performance measurement approaches is therefore essential for developing digital solutions that truly create value rather than simply automating existing inefficiencies. Without grounding in how organizations formulate strategies, assess performance through balanced scorecards and variance analysis, and manage through control systems, IT and AI professionals risk building sophisticated technologies that miss strategic context entirely.

Conversely, strategic thinking divorced from digital capabilities remains the kind of empty rhetoric Kay criticizes. In an era where strategy and technology are fundamentally intertwined, mastering both strategic frameworks and performance management principles becomes prerequisite for creating digital solutions that drive genuine competitive advantage.

Discussion

How would you explain the term strategy?

Contents

In this course, we will have a look at following topics

1. Understanding strategy
   — definition, formation, and competitive positioning (lectures 1-3)
2. Building strategic advantage
   — resources, capabilities, and organizational design (lectures 4-6)
3. Performance management and control
   — measuring and managing strategic performance (lectures 7-9)

Learning objectives

During this course, you should advance your skills in the following areas:

• Understanding of concepts and taxonomies of strategy
• Basic knowledge of underlying theories of strategic management and decision-making
• Understanding of tools and frameworks for the development, analysis and implementation of strategies
• Knowledge of key concepts and frameworks for decision making under uncertainty
• Understanding of the role of IT strategy and its relationship with business strategy
• Ability to work independently with literature to derive key-insights
• Application of concepts, tools, and framework in real-life cases

Delivery

This course will be taught using traditional synchronous lectures.

The focus of the classes is to briefly introduce, discuss and apply major concepts, tools and methods of strategic management.

Many of the classes will involve group work, discussions and short presentations.

The greatest amount of work is in preparing for and following up lectures in order to become sufficiently familiar with and understand the content.

It is necessary to prepare for each session, for instance by reading a paper, details (see Table 2).

Please prepare your schedule accordingly.

Effort

Effort distribution for average students

 

 

Figure 1: Effort distribution for average students

For this course you will receive 5 ECTS. This corresponds to approx. 150 hours of work required by an average student to pass the course.

• Classes (approx. 30 hours)
• Paper reading (approx. 25 hours; approx. 2.5 hours per paper)
• Follow-up and exam preparation (do the math yourself)

Grading

Exam

There will be a written exam at the end of the semester.

The exam will

• take place during the examination weeks,
• will last 90 minutes,
• cover all contents discussed in lecture,
• focus on the application of the knowledge gained in the course.

A note on grades

It is unlikely that every student will receive a very good grade, i.e. deliver an outstanding performance — see the meaning of grades. Instead, it is to be expected that the grades will spread across the spectrum.

Grade	Meaning
1 — very good	A truly outstanding achievement that (not only) shows no deficiencies in the criteria mentioned, but also gives both the supervisor and external assessors an excellent impression.
2 — good	Work that exceeds the average requirements/performance and is easily recognizable and presentable to the outside world as a “good performance”.
Note	2.5 is the average of passed assessments, i.e., an “average performance”
3 — satisfactory	A performance that achieves the desired goal “to a satisfactory extent”; however, deficiencies can be identified here and there.
4 — sufficient	A performance that “still adequately satisfies” the requirements, but deviates from the expectations placed on it in several ways.
5 — not sufficient	A performance that does not meet several of the criteria mentioned.

Table 1: Meaning of grades

Last year’s results

This is the grade distribution from last year (average grade 3.5):

%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': { 'xyChart': {'backgroundColor': 'transparent', 'titleColor': '#0333ff', 
'xAxisLabelColor': '#333', 'yAxisLabelColor': '#333', 'plotColorPalette': '#0333ff'}}, 'xyChart': {'width': 700, 
'height': 350}}}%%
xychart-beta
    x-axis "Grade" ["1,00", "1,30", "1,70", "2,00", "2,30", "2,70", "3,00", "3,30", "3,70", "4,00", "5,00"]
    y-axis "Count" 0 --> 20
    bar [4, 3, 1, 3, 2, 3, 7, 10, 5, 9, 20]

Figure 2: Grading statistics for Winter Term 2024/25

Schedule

Date	Topic	Preparation
09.10.25	Strategy Definition and Schools	—
16.10.25	Competitive Analysis and Positioning	Read Hallegatte (2009)
23.10.25	Strategy Formation	Read Mintzberg (1978), research on Netflix
30.11.25	Resource-based Advantages	Read Peteraf (1993)
06.11.25	Self-study (consolidation)	Review the contents, prepare questions
13.11.25	IT-Kongress, Q&A (12 am - 1 pm, Zoom)	Review the contents, prepare questions
20.11.25	Organizational Design	Listen to Decoder and read Lorenz & Buchwald (2023)
27.11.25	Ethics and Values	Read Barnett & Salomon (2012)
04.12.25	Meta Case Study (Pt. 1)	Listen to Meta Story on Acquired
11.12.25	Corporate Performance Management	—
18.12.25	CPM and OKRs	—
08.01.25	Meta Case Study (Pt. 2)	Research data for all case study tasks
15.01.26	IT Strategy	Read Chen et al. (2010)
22.01.26	Exam Preparation	Review the contents, prepare questions

Table 2: Schedule winter term 2025 (may be subjected to changes)

Q&A

Literature

Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.

Chen, D. Q., Mocker, M., Preston, D. S., & Teubner, A. (2010). Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly, 233–259.

Hallegatte, S. (2009). Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 240–247.

Lorenz, F., & Buchwald, A. (2023). A perfect match or an arranged marriage? How chief digital officers and chief information officers perceive their relationship: A dyadic research design. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), 372–389.

Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. W., & Lampel, J. (2005). Strategy bites back: It is a lot more, and less, than you ever imagined–. Pearson Education.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.